![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lorimtThe following thoughts occur to me as I plan to update this LJ. As I want the other entries to be coherent, I shall dump them here.
-Ariel, Cal and Jeff don't have livejournal. This is a pity, particularly as Ariel knows origami stuff and probably remembers more of the origami talk than I do. Cal and Jeff are summer math incarnate. Shmack and Katy's journal almost compensate but not quite.
-Lawns exist to look nice, lawn-mowers exist to make lawns look nice. Trees look nicer. Hills like trees much more than lawn-mowers like hills. (Best analogy ever)
-Computers with on-off switches should make use of them. Tilting the entire tower an inch or so is not an intuitive on-off switch.
-Ariel, Cal and Jeff don't have livejournal. This is a pity, particularly as Ariel knows origami stuff and probably remembers more of the origami talk than I do. Cal and Jeff are summer math incarnate. Shmack and Katy's journal almost compensate but not quite.
-Lawns exist to look nice, lawn-mowers exist to make lawns look nice. Trees look nicer. Hills like trees much more than lawn-mowers like hills. (Best analogy ever)
-Computers with on-off switches should make use of them. Tilting the entire tower an inch or so is not an intuitive on-off switch.
no subject
The only source of math origami info I know of is Tom Hull's website (it's http://web.merrimack.edu/~thull/OrigamiMath.html, if you don't know it.) (Tom Hull is the guy who did the talk.)
Oh, one more thing: in the two-coloring I told you about, only count creases that are folded in the end result. A crease to find your place doesn't count..