Name Upon a Star
Dec. 21st, 2003 11:16 pmI was looking into those star naming services as a possible gift idea, and have discovered they are pretty much a scam. Moreover, they are a really easy scam. In fact, there is nothing stopping me from starting my own star registration program. I have decided that the phrase "Name Upon a Star" is currently only being used for bad poetry, and so I can steal it, and use it for my own purposes.
What, you may ask, do I have that the other scam artists, I mean business people, out there don't already have? Blatant honesty and no expectation of making money.
sithjawa and I have decided to go into business together. We (by which I mostly mean I,
sithjawa is just along to be the dignified one...) can offer to name a star for you. This name will have no official meaning whatsoever, and will almost certainly NOT be recognized by the IAU who has the right to name stars. (That is the honesty bit in action, folks) Moreover, although we might copyright your name along with the star, you could do this yourself using the symbol insertion in Microsoft word or your other favorite word processor to copyright whatever you darn well please. In fact, we will probably have a do it yourself option, where you copyright the star yourself, right in the comments section. Also, we'll tell you that if you search around on google, there are some free programs that will let you find "your" star based on its coordinates. (Aren't we generous?)
Anyhow, if you've always wanted a star named after you, or at least a chance to pretend you have a star named after you, here is your chance.
For two cents (We trust you'll pay), you can put your "Name Upon a Star" by leaving comment below with the following information: Your name, the coordinates of a star, and a little copyright symbol.
For something worth more than two cents (food, cash, shiny foil), one of
sithjawa or I might be persuaded to do some of this work for you. It seems unlikely. But you can bid for our amusement, if you'd like.
Just think, at these low, low prices, we're by far the best deal on star naming you'll find out there. For our fee plus around ten dollars, you could have a star named after you, and a book about the stars, to help you learn more about the sky. (Assuming you can find said book for about ten dollars.)
Thank you, and good night.
PS: Yes, this does mean I made it home safely. And there is snow! Beautiful, beautiful snow.
What, you may ask, do I have that the other scam artists, I mean business people, out there don't already have? Blatant honesty and no expectation of making money.
Anyhow, if you've always wanted a star named after you, or at least a chance to pretend you have a star named after you, here is your chance.
For two cents (We trust you'll pay), you can put your "Name Upon a Star" by leaving comment below with the following information: Your name, the coordinates of a star, and a little copyright symbol.
For something worth more than two cents (food, cash, shiny foil), one of
Just think, at these low, low prices, we're by far the best deal on star naming you'll find out there. For our fee plus around ten dollars, you could have a star named after you, and a book about the stars, to help you learn more about the sky. (Assuming you can find said book for about ten dollars.)
Thank you, and good night.
PS: Yes, this does mean I made it home safely. And there is snow! Beautiful, beautiful snow.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 12:00 am (UTC)Steve
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 12:28 am (UTC)"For something worth more than two cents (food, cash, shiny foil), one of sithjawa or I might be persuaded to do some of this work for you. It seems unlikely. But you can bid for our amusement, if you'd like."
It is clear that any of the three that is individually worth more than two cents fits the criteria. My legal council will be contacting you shortly.
::calls up Dina, Kara, and Rachel, his pre-law friends::
Steve
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 12:35 am (UTC)For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 12:42 am (UTC)On the early morning of December 22, 2003:
...
Please note the record shows my accusor sent his hostile reply after my efforts at clarification.
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 12:58 am (UTC)Character indeed.
Steve
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:06 am (UTC)Let the record show the *full text* of that conversation:
MathDorkSteve (12:28:05 AM): ::replies::
LoriMT (12:30:03 AM): legal council, legal council!!!
MathDorkSteve (12:30:09 AM): :)
LoriMT (12:30:22 AM): if you do not wish to settle this as "gentlemen" we shall respond in kind
LoriMT (12:30:22 AM): consider yourself warned
This unwarrented attack on my person (in the form of the comment this is in reply to) is wholly uncalled for.
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:07 am (UTC)KitsuneErrant (1:05:44 AM): ::hits steve with a fish::
Steve
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:10 am (UTC)Steve
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:17 am (UTC)Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:23 am (UTC)Steve
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:17 am (UTC)Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:22 am (UTC)I maintain my plea-- that "Name Upon a Star" have its leadership dissolved, and its assets ceded to me in payment for damages.
Steve
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:30 am (UTC)Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 05:01 am (UTC)Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-23 08:10 am (UTC)The incident with the squid has been rereferred to a lower court.
Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-22 01:12 am (UTC)Re: For the record, since it appears to be necessary at this point
Date: 2003-12-23 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 10:44 am (UTC)Oh, and you wanted two cents.
Okay...¢¢
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 11:10 am (UTC)